Home > Finance > Comparison of Dynamic and Condenser Mic

Comparison of Dynamic and Condenser Mic

February 20th, 2010

Exceptional and steeply-priced microphones along with preamps are generally the most prevalent in studios and the gadgets obsessives out there however, the player is certainly the virtually all primary element in getting a remarkable sound. I know someone who encountered this classical guitar thrown aside in a dumpster. It happens to be separated along the entire body and repaired by means of duct tape and he can’t remember when he last swapped the actual strings nonetheless, he knows insights on how to perform and that’s the process that carries this recording.

For the simple reason that we can locate six diverse mics in the front of the particular classical guitar. A good pricey ribbon, a large diaphragm condenser, Three small-scale diaphragm condensers as well as ultimately a common inexpensive dynamic mic. Mic comparisons are a waste of time in quite a few procedures due to the fact that you can’t get every single mic on accurately the best suited zone and its obvious that they are probably going to all sound “different”. That doesn’t necessarily suggest “poor or good” it means different. On a completely different time of day on a unique session with a completely different guitarist together with some sort of different nylon string guitar within a different space you could prefer a unique microphone.

Down load the songs and listen to the individual mics and you ought to end up being capable to notice instantaneously the discrepancy concerning the actual AEA ribbon and the Shure sm57 however could a person genuinely claim for certain which of the particular modest diaphragm mics is which?

Precisely what this specific multimike session does carry out superbly is high light the challenges a person may have with phase while applying more than a single microphone. Solo each microphone and have a listen and it’s evident, independently they most seem fine. Now using the NT5 in solo include to it the Shure SM 57 and immediately you hear that the two mics are usually badly out of phase and the audio turns into small and “Phasey”. At this point carry out the same although this specific time with the NT5 and the Shure SM81. Yet again significant issues - but in cases where you look at the NT5 vs the various other 3 mics,the AEA ribbon, the AT 4047 and the Neumann KM84 they are usually all moderately good. They would possibly be marginally out of phase however not enough to be able to wreck ones own sound if you combine them collectively.

Now check the 4047 as well as the SM57. Can you see that they are generally out of phase with every single other yet nowhere near as poor as the earlier examples? It is really a fine lesson in that when you are possibly thinking of using more than just one mic on a sound you should always look at the phase. Phase appears to end up being a significant issue for persons starting off recording.

Does the low price $100.00 dynamic sm57 sound dreadful? Of course not. It is a excellent common workhorse microphone and whenever which is all you’ve got subsequently utilize your own ears and also by means of positioning it around the most suitable place people may achieve a quality recording.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • blinkbits
  • BlinkList
  • De.lirio.us
  • Fark
  • Faves
  • Fleck
  • Furl
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • description
  • Simpy
  • Spurl
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • ThisNext
  • TwitThis
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Yigg

Finance

Comments are closed.